Next Post

NEXT POST WILL BE PUBLISHED ON OR
AROUND June 7, 2016.

SHOWN TO THE RIGHT, ARE THE CONTENTS OF THE 11/27/12 LETTER SIGNED BY PRIORITY ONE CREDIT UNION PRESIDENT, CHARLES R. WIGGINGTON, SR. IN COMPLIANCE TO THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREED TO BY THE CREDIT UNION AND A MEMBER WHO SUED THE CREDIT UNION, ALLEGING THEIR WILLFUL VIOLATION OF THE PRIVACY ACT.

Our Readership: U .S., Ukraine, Russia, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Malta, Malaysia, Laos, Canada, Greece, Turkey, Sweden, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Isle of Man, Portugal, Morocco and more!

Translate

SEARCH THIS SITE

Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Hiding Facts and Pushing Lies

OUR CRITICS

We too often find the infrequent comments posted on this blog by Priority One Credit Union's President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr.'s defenders to be nothing less than incredible. 
They apparently suffer from tunnel vision and an inability to differentiate between right and wrong. Inexplicably, they possess the ability to ignore his well-documented history of abuses, business failures and horrendous personal behaviors which include sexually harassing a former employee and repossessing a member's automobile and afterwards, transferring ownership to himself without paying any money for the vehicle. His acquisition of the car defrauded the credit of money that should have been gotten from the vehicle's sale at auction and then applied to the unpaid balance due on the loan. 

Despite these and other atrocious acts, there are a few people who post on this blog, and consider the President a victim. Many of them apparently lack the ability to differentiate between right and wrong and lack the ability to comprehend the gravity of what the President has done and continues to do. Even his lies to the DFI seem of no concern to his handful of proponents who see the President through rose-colored glasses. 

Two comments recently posted by readers state that Priority One's employees are afraid they may lose their jobs if they comment about the President's behaviors. We understand though we find it interesting that the President has never shown any reservation about publicly disparaging employees, members and vendors.  

We recently received an email from an employee of Priority One who stated that Human Resources "clerk", Esmeralda Sandoval, recently told several employees that if they are unhappy with the way the President manages the company, them they should "move on." 

Miss Sandoval is apparently too obtuse to comprehend that what people don't like about the President is more than the way he chooses to manage the credit union, though that is but one issue, but it is his chronic violations of policy and state and federal laws. His abuses of staff, his indulgence in vicious gossip and his immersion in character assassination, have heavily taxed employees and damaged morale. One would have thought that as a staff member of the Human Resources Department that Miss Sandoval would have understood this. 

Some of the sporadic comments that have been posted are purportedly intended to defend the President by leveling attacks against us and include declarations that they know our identity, that "you better do your job" and that we will be fired sometimes in the near future. The comments apparently are full of assumptions. What his defenders consistently fail to provide is evidence disproving what we report and reducing their statements to nothing more than defensive babbling. We invite any of the President's defenders to please provide evidence disproving anything we've reported since March 2009, though don't expect us to hold our breaths waiting.


THE ELECTION

One of the topics in this post is the 2009 election which was conducted earlier this year to fill this positions which became available on the  Supervisory Committee. 

As we reported in previous posts, late last year the President and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, conspired to disrupt the election by limiting the number of members who would receive the state-mandated announcement of the election and invitation to nominate themselves to vie for one of the available.seats. They published the mandated notice in the credit union's Winter Newsletter which is only mailed to members who have a checking account and excluding the larger contingent of members who only have a savings account. 

We exposed their plot which forced an emergency meeting at the credit union's main branch in South Pasadena, California. During the meeting, the Board and Supervisory Committee and President Wiggington convened to try and derive a solution. Unable to circumvent the illegal act perpetrated by the President and Board Chair, it was decided to hold a second election which forced the credit union to spend money reprinting ballots, reprinting notices, and of course, having to spend more money needed to mail ballots. The conspiracy concocted by the President and Board Chair forced Priority One to spend money to hold another election, bringing into questions the veracity of the President's statements made during last May's annual meeting in which he said he is reducing spending, "streamling" and "working smarter." The crime perpetrated by the President and Board Chair dispels any notion that either knows anything about "working smarter." 

Some employees spoke to an auditor at the Department of Financial Institutions ("DFI") who confirmed that all members in good standing must receive notice of the upcoming election and an invitation to members, to nominate themselves to vie for a seat on either the Board or Supervisory Committee. 

Before we reported his crime, the President confidently strolled though the South Pasadena branch confidant and jovial. However, the President's mood soured after we exposed his plot and the Board and Supervisory Committee decided to conduct an entirely new election rather than risking the chance that employees could potentially file complaints with the state which could prove costly and embarrassing to the already scandal-ridden credit union. .  

THE DAMAGE 

Though a new election was ordered and more money spent to repeat the electoral process tampered with by the President and Board Chair, there were no nominations submitted for the second election, though former Director, David L. Davidson, did submit his nomination to vie for one of the two seats available on the Supervisory Committee. Clearly, Mrs. Harris-Brooks's and the President's decision to violate state law compromised the integrity of the electoral process which had never been meddled with since the credit union opened for business in 1926. The complete lack of response by members may indicate that members have lost all interest in the credit union's future and may not want to be associated with the notorious organization. 

The President's and Mrs. Harris-Brooks' plan was to do all in their power to ensure the current Directors and Supervisors remained unchanged. Last year, the President disclosed that the current body of Directors and Supervisors "do everything Diedra wants them to do" and she, in turn, allows the President to realize all his plans- legal and illegal. What's more, this year, David L. Davidson, submitted his nomination. After Mr. Davidson' nomination was received the President complained that Mr. Davidson was not welcome on the Supervisory Committee. It's interesting and telling that both the Preident and Board Chair were threatened by the White former Director. Mr. Davidson, who is an ethical and forthright person, is hated by the President because in 2007, he delivered an anonymous letter mailed to his residence which exposed then AVP, Liz Campos, of incurring more than 24 individual NSF incidents to her Priority One checking account, to credit union attorney, William Adler. Following an investigation that proved Mrs. Campos had been kiting, the attorney ordered her termination. Following her departure, the President complained to employees that he had been "forced to fire Lz" and swore that he would "get Dave [Davidson]." 


REVENGE

In 2007, the President decided to hire a financial planner. He said that adding a financial planner to staff would increase business. He was wrong. 

Mr. Davidson was a financial planner employed by CUSO, When he learned about the position that was being create, Mr. Davidson contacted the President who promptly hired. Because employees of the credit union cannot also serve on it's Board, Mr. Davidson who was a Director, resigned his post. 

While employed, AVP, Lynette Fortson, contacted the President and complained about Mr. Davidson and describing him as rude and unprofessional. At the time, Mrs. Fortson had told some of her staff that she didn't like "that White man."  The President called CUSO, Mr. Davidson's employer and told him he was firing the financial planner. Mr. Davidson was fired by both the credit union and CUSO. The President used treachery and slander to avenge himself against Mr. Davidson. What the morally deprived President refused to acknowledge is that his AVP, Mrs. Campos, violated federal law. Not only should she have been fired, she should have been arrested, booked and prosecuted but the amoral President can never understand because in the end and like spoiled child, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. will do everything and anything to get his way. 


WHO IS JEFFREY CHEN?

When it was decided a second election would be conducted, Director, Bobby Thomas, joined the fray and told the President and Board Chair that he would find a candidate to run in the election which might help to dilute the number of votes that could potentially to to Mr. Davidson. Mr. Thomas found a postal carrier named Jeffrey Chen and easily convinced him that his inclusion on the Supervisory Committee would contribute in ensuring the safety, prosperity and growth of the credit union. Of course, Mr. Thomas' statements were nothing more than a disingenuous sales pitch. 

Mr. Chen was handed a nomination application and asked to submit it by the stipulated deadline. As the last day approached, when all nomination applications had to be submitted, Mrs. Harris-Brooks wrote to the member and asked that he return the completed nomination application as soon as was possible. This was the first and only time, Mrs. Harris-Brooks would write to a nominee and remind them to return their completed application. However, Mr. Chen did not return the application by the stated deadline.

After the deadline, the Board Chair contacted Bobby, asking he visit Mr. Chen and ask that he complete the application. At this point, the credit union was no longer, under the law, able to accept applications, simply because the deadline has passed. But as history has proven time and time again, the agendas of either President Wiggington or Board Chair, Mrs. Harris-Brooks, will never to deterred by something like laws, policies, or rules. 

A few days later and days after the deadline had passed, Mr. Chen visited the South Pasadena branch in South Pasadena and informed the receptionist that he was delivering his nomination to vie for a seat on the Supervisory Committee. According to Loan Department staff who sat a few feet from the reception desk, Mr. Chen became irate when the receptionist informed him that the deadline for submitting nomination applications had passed. Mr. Chen exclaimed that Director, Bobby Thomas, had told him he could submit his nomination application after the deadline. 


While Mr. Chen waited, the receptionist called the President and advised him that Mr. Chen was delivering a nomination application after the deadline date.  The President informed her that this was fine and asked her to thank Mr. Chen. The President arrived at the reception desk a short time later and taking the application in his hand, exclaimed loudly, "I've been waiting for this!"


DIRECTOR JANICE IRVING

The Board Chair, the President and the COO met and decided they would also campaign against Board Director, Janice Irving, because in 2008, Mrs. Irving voted for the termination of the President when evidence proved he sexually harassed a former employee. In the President's words, "It's time for her [Janice Irving] to go." 

Ms. Walker also inducted the assistance of Credit Resolutions Director, Yvonne Boutte, who told (not asked) her staff to make sure that they did not vote for Mrs. Irving, whose seat on the Board had come up for re-election. 


We must now wait for the election results to be made public but clearly, the President and Board Chair had no qualms in violating state laws and proving once again, that ethical conduct means absolutely nothing to the officers of what has become a credit union wallowing in losses. 

We hope members read the biographies which were provided with the ballots. Almost all the biographies were written in the third person, indicating they were not written by the nominees or incumbents. We've recently learned that President Wiggington contracted the services of Turner, Warren, Hwang and Conrad to write the biographies. Wasn't there a single person at the credit union who could write the biographies? Is this expense another way the President is "working smarter?" You may notice that David Davidson's biography is pushed to the bottom half of the page, strategically tucked away on the right hand corner. 

Though exposed of violating state law and forcing a second election, the President and Board Chair could not control their compulsion to corrupt the electoral process and found willing allies in COO, Beatrice Walker; Director, Bobby Thomas; and Credit Resolutions Director, Yvonne Boutte. 


THE PLUNGE

The credit union's financial troubles began after President William E. Harris retired and under his successor, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. Under President Wiggington, the credit union has found itself forced into obscurity. 

Losses are the result of President Wiggington's ineptitude as a leader. He has no comprehension of marketing and his decisions are borne out of his personal belief system.

The intrusion in this year's electoral process was designed to preserve the Board's and Supervisory Committee's current dynamic securely in place. But why? Not one of the Directors or Supervisors has contributed anything that has impelled growth. The reason why Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, and the President found it easy to break the law is because retention of the current Directors and Supervisors insures that the Board Chair's and President's agendas are realized. Election of a new Director or Supervisor could affect the ability of the two officers to realize their plans which are always self-serving and never benefit the credit union.

Since 2007, the President has always blamed other people for the acts he alone, perpetrated. In 2007 and 2008, he attributed the slow down in business on "the mess" he inherited from former President Harris. But wasn't Mr. Harris' last day of employment, December 31, 2006? 

Earlier this year, he found a new scapegoat in CFO, Manny Gaitmaitan, who he described as "difficult", "uncooperative" and "not a team player." 

A visit to NCUA.gov reveals that in the years while Mr. Harris served as President, Priority One remained in the BLACK. In fact, only since President Wiggington became President has Priority One found itself immersed in the RED. The following financial information was obtained from the NCUA's website: 

Net Losses/Gains
September 2009
-$235,353.10

YTD
-4,423,557.82

The month of Net losses and gains for the month of August 2009 was -$184,648.82 while the year-to-date total was -$4,188,204.71. As readers have pointed out, the credit union continues to lose money though the President continues to describe business as "good" and "growing." 

 Some Pre-Wiggington Financials

Net Income Total
Quarter Ending June 2006
$164,358,374

Net Income GAIN - September 2006
+$530,857

September 2006
3rd Qtr

Total Assets
$173,252,329

Net Income (Loss)
+$802,443
December 2006
4th Quarter

Total Assets
$172,250,649

Net Income (Loss)
+$706,969

The financials, shown below, were reported by the credit union for the quarter ending on March 2007. This is the first quarter following the January 1, 2007, appointment of Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. to President. . 

Quarter Ending 3/31/07 
Net Income Total 
$169,246,575

As shown above, during the first quarter of 2007 and under the leadership of President Wiggington, Net Income dropped by approximately $3 million. Why would the cycle of growth have been reversed under President Wiggington? 

On the quarter ending June 30, 2007, Net Income declined to $167,775,277. Why were losses continuing? 

In the quarter ending September 2009, Net Income declined to $165,516,581.

The cycle of losses that have impacted the credit union began almost immediately after Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. began his appointment as President. Coincidence? 

In mid-2008, in a desperate attempt  to improve the credit union's finanical standing on paper, the President obtained approval from the Board allowing him to borrow $20 million from the credit union's line-of-credit. By the end of 2008 and as a result of the $20 million loan, Net Income increased to $179, 651,326. 

Not one of the President's predecessor found it necessary to borrow money from the credit union's line-of credit. Furthermore, none was a slave to vanity. The imprudent decision to borrow $20 million was fueled by pride, to create the impression that Ne Income was $20 million higher than it actually was. But obtainment of the high loan came at a cost, forcing the credit union to pay more than $30,000 per month on interest alone. The President's decision was sanctioned by the ignorant Board of Directors and added to the credit union's debt and dispelling the President's self-authored myth that he is "working smarter." Nothing can be further than the truth. If anything, President Wiggington is working dumber.

Not only has his blundering decisions added to Priority One's debt but the loan did absolutely nothing to alleviate the credit union financial problems and in the end, amounted to just more smoke and mirrors from a man who relies upon deception in his quest to raise pretentious and empty facades. 

Monday, May 11, 2009

Backtracking

HUMAN BEHAVIOR 

In our May 2, 2009 post, we reported about Priority One Credit Union's President, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr., and the Boar Chair's, Diedra Harris-Brooks, recent reactions to the disclosure of acts and statements the two made publicly but never imagined would find its way to the Internet. 


In response, the two have increased security at the South Pasadena branch though none of their efforts have addressed the fact that much of the information we publish is based obtained from the President's frequent disclosures of confidential information, usually made to non-management staff. Evidently, the President and Board Chair have a problem with evaluating their respective behaviors and as is often the case at Priority One, always seeks scapegoats that fall victim to their inquisitions.


The two have been duplicitous in their zeal to ensure their control over all aspects of the credit union remains unchallenged. Of course, it is their often illegal tactics that have most often driven their acts into the forefront and on to the Internet.

In 2008, Mrs. Harris-Brooks called SOME of the Board's Director to South Pasadena and one Supervisor, to listen to evidence gathered by an investigator hired to obtain evidence that President Wiggington sexually harassed a former employee. Her invitation excluded Directors, Joe Marchica and Janice Irving. An employee of the credit union called Mrs. Irving and informed her of the meetng which she had purposely not been invited to by Mrs. Harris-Brooks. Mrs. Irving arrived with Mr. Marchica and after reviewing the evidence and listening to the investigator's recommendation that Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. be terminated, voted for the President's ouster. However, Mrs. Harris-Brooks along with Directors, O. Glen Saffold and Thomas Gathers and Supervisory Committee Chair, Cornelia Simmons invalidated the gravity of the accusations, dismissed the investigator's recommendation, and suppressed the evidence, voting instead for the President's reinstatement.

In December 2008, the two attempted to control the elections planned for 2009, but their plot dissolved quickly after being exposed. They literally backtracked after we contacted the DFI and spoke to an auditor who confirmed that credit union is required by law to post notice of upcoming elections in branch lobbies. What's more, the credit union is mandated by law to send notices apprising members of the impending election and extend an invitation for interested members to nominate themselves to run for any available seats on the Board of Supervisory Committee.

Priority One was intentionally and clearly out of compliance. Furthermore, the two made sure the notice and invitation was only contained in the credit union's Winter newsletter which is only mailed to members who have a checking account and thus excluding the significantly larger sector of members who only have a savings account.


The Annual Meeting
The Notice of the Meeting is Amended

In April, the following notice was sent to Members


A meeting was convened at South Pasadena and attended by Directors and Supervisors. 

Annual Meeting Notice Wednesday May 27, 2009


The annual meeting of Priority One Credit Union will be held Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 6:00 PM. The meeting will be held at South Pasadena Headquarters 1631 Huntington Drive South PasadenaCA 91030. 


At the meeting, the CEO will report on the status of the Credit Union. 

In addition, the results of our election will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the Credit Union’s bylaws, notice was given to the membership that Nominations by Petition were sought for one (1) vacancy on the Board of Directors, and two (2) vacancies on the Supervisory Committee. Nominations for these vacancies closed at midnight on February 28, 2009, and no nominations by petitions were received. Thus, in accordance with the bylaws, the nominees selected by the Nominating Committee for each of the positions will be deemed elected. 

Except as provided above, no other new business will be conducted at the Annual Meeting. Priority One Credit Union 

Over the weekend, a member forwarded a copy of a letter mailed to their residence. The letter, titled “A Message to Members regarding the Annual Meeting”, is an amended notice announcing the upcoming Annual Meeting. We've learned that the newest notice was sent in response to our expose', Having been discovered, the President, the Board and the Supervisory Committee hurriedly tried to retrack those acts intended to manipulate the electoral process. Here is the amended letter issued by the Board and Supervisory Committee:

Priority One Credit Union 

Message to Members regarding the Annual Meeting 

All members are invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Priority One Credit Union. 

When: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. 
Where: Priority One Credit Union 
South Pasadena Headquarters 
1631 Huntington Drove 
South Pasadena, CA 91030 

At the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors, Supervisory Committee and President/CEO will jointly report on the status of the Credit Union. As discussed further below, no unscheduled business will be conducted during the Annual Meeting. However, immediately following the adjournment of the scheduled business of the Annual Meeting, there will be a Question and Answer session for members. 

As you know, the announcement of election results is generally held during the Annual Meeting. Recently, the Board of Directors and Supervisory Committee have become aware of concerns as to the distribution of the notice of vacancies to members. To this end, the Board of Directors and Supervisory Committee have considered that there may be members who were interested in being nominated to run for either: (a)the one(1) position on the Board of Directors, or (b) one of the two (2) positions on the Supervisory Committee. Each of these positions are for three (3) year terms. Consequently, in the interest of fairness for all, the Board of Directors and Supervisory Committee have determined it is appropriate to re-open the nomination and election process. 

Accordingly, any member in good standing who is interested in seeking nominations for the above available positions on the Board of Directors or Supervisory Committee should request a nomination application from the Nominating Committee in writing to the following address: 

Nominating Committee 
P.O. Box 512195 
Los Angeles, CA 90051-0195 

All completed nomination applications must be submitted to the Nominating Committee at the above address no later than midnight June 8, 2009.

The Nominating Committee will consider up to three (3) members for each open position. Those not selected by the Nominating Committee will be allowed the opportunity to seek nomination process is complete, an election notice will be mailed to all voting members with the names of those persons nominated. Subject to there being more nominees than open positions, a written ballot will be provide to all voting members. If, on the other hand, there are no more nominations than open positions, then those nominated shall be deemed elected in accordance with the Bylaws.

The information is excessive but should be interpreted as a desperate effort by the Board's and Supervisory Committee's to rectify a wrong committed by Mrs. Harris-Brooks and her accomplice, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr.

Last week, President Wiggington revealed that he recently swore to the Board of Directors that he would flush out the blogger and bloggers and that he would make sure all employees stopped gossiping. Interesting that the most verbose person in the entire credit union and the biggest violator of confidentiality would accuse others of gossiping and promising to drive those employees into the open. Its epitome of hypocrisy but then again, its just Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. being Charles R. Wiggington, Sr.
  • The President has compiled an impressive and equally, embarrassing history of abuses. In 1999, he took possession of a member's automobile and transferred ownership to himself without paying for the vehicle. He defrauded the credit union and ruined a member's credit. 
  • In 2002, his friend and automobile broker, Henry Justice of Justice Auto Sales, absconded with more than $60,000 of credit union funds paid to him for 4 automobiles purchased by members from his dealership. In 2009,  the President tried to resurrect a business relationship with Mr. Justice and might have succeeded had we not exposed it on this blog. 
  • In 2007, he harassed and abused the Director of Marketing and finally laid her off.
  • In 2006, he promoted Liz Campos to the post of AVP despite that she incurred more than 24 individual NSF incidents to her checking account, during the months of September 2006 and January 2007. An investigation later proved she had been kiting- a federal offense and she was afterwards terminated. The incensed President, swore he would find and terminate the person(s) who exposed Mr. Campos, ignoring the one overshadowing fact she violated federal law. 
President Wiggington has proven he is lethal to business and employees. He has single-handedly pushed Priority One Credit Union into a state of regression and is unraveling all that was accomplished through the hard work of his predecessors and their staffs. Don't expect things to improve as long as he remains President and Diedra Harris-Brooks and her posy of clowns continue sanctioning the President's disastrous campaigns. 




Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Survival of the Fittest

THE MAILING FIASCO OF 2007

Immediately after beginning his appointment as President of Priority One Credit Union on January 1, 2007, President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. incurred three major setbacks within the first three months of his administration. These were:
  • The debacle with transferring information about Inland Counties FCU's members into Priority One's database
  • The discovery that one of President Wiggington's hand-picked AVP's had been kiting- a federal offense; and 
  • The mailing of ballots to members in envelopes on whose exterior were printed account and social security numbers belong to members. 

It was not only a disastrous start but possibly an omen of things to come. What's more, President Wiggington's decision to select an AVP who was kiting and his mailing of ballots in envelopes on whose exterior were printed member social and credit union account numbers were both entirely avoidable had he chosen to adhere to the credit union's established security protocols. Not only did he not comply, he refused to. 

The 2007 Election

Each year, Priority One conducts elections to elect Directors and Supervisors to fill vacant seats on the Board of Directors and/or Supervisory Committee. 

In 2007, the President ordered the IT Supervisor to create a disk on which were contained information about all active members in good standing. The information would be sent to the credit union's printing company who would create ballots that would be mailed to the list of members whose names were provided on the disk. Prior to Charles R. Wiggington, Sr.s appointment to President, a sample batch of envelopes containing ballots, were always given to the President who in those days was William E. Harris. Mr. Harris accompanied by the Director of Marketing, would review the sample batch to ensure there were no errors involving the intended mailing. 

In 2007, this all changed when President Wiggington not only refused to review the disk containing information about the members who were to be sent ballots but he also refused to review the batch of sample ballots that were handed to him prior to the mailing. At the time, his excuse for refusing to review the sample ballots was simply, "I'm President, I don't do that." And so, ballots were mailed to members in envelopes on whose exterior were printed member account and social security numbers. 

Members received the ballots but none noticed that just above the window displaying their name and addresses appeared their Priority One account and social security numbers. In fact, the violation of confidential information wasn't discovered until a member took the envelope he received to the Valencia branch and an employee of that office, noticed the credit union's error. 

When news of the error reached the President he immediately denied all accountability and said the mistake had been caused by the IT Supervisor. The lazy Board, accepted the President's statements as fact without actually investigating the incident or speaking to the IT Supervisor and upon President Wiggington's advice, suspended the IT Supervisor instead of terminating him. 

The President issued a letter to all members apologizing for the incident and offering every member a one-year free subscription to EQUIFAX. Members who accepted the offer, received alerts from EQUIFAX whenever activity occurred on their credit report. President Wiggington's very avoidable error cost the credit union more than $100,000 to rectify. 

A few weeks following his suspension, the IT Supervisor resigned, embarrassed by the entire incident and only after realizing that President Wiggington used him as a scapegoat for a situation the President created. Here are some links we've located that pertain to the breach caused entirely by President Wiggington:








The following post, published on the Internet, was written by Steve Bass, a member of Priority One. The post is Mr. Bass' reaction to the breach caused by the credit union.

Priority One Credit Union's security breach 2007-05-31
Steve Bass



I'm watching my credit union account like a hawk. That's because Priority One Credit Union -- the one I use -- had a security breach that was stunning.They recently sent election ballots to members. Printed on the outside of the envelope were some numbers. The first was our account number.


That might not have been enough to help with anyone intent on identity theft, so they also printed my social security number on the envelope.
I received a letter the other day. They told me they deeply regretted the inconvenience. Me, too.

I see it as much more than an inconvenience. I also doubt that their "top priority is my privacy and security," otherwise this wouldn't have happened.

The letter, from Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. CEO and President, goes on to say they "take the security of [my] information so seriously" that they plan to implement enhancements" to ensure this won't happen again. I think one enhancement ought to be the dismissal of the person who made the egregious error.

They're providing a one-year free Equifax subscription, a minimal response for such a substantial error. I think it ought to be a law that any agency guilty of a security breach should be forced to make a one-year commitment to help if the person becomes a victim of identify theft.

In the meantime, I'm keeping close watch on my account balance.

Source:
# block visitors referred from indicated domains RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} semalt\.com [NC,OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} semalt\.com [NC] RewriteRule .* - [F]