THE ANNOUNCEMENT
We had a completely different post in mind but were diverted by a notice posted last week on Priority One Credit Union's website. The message announced that the credit union's Annual Meeting will take place at the main branch in south Pasadena, California on May 27, 2009, starting at 6 p.m.
The notice appears to be a reaction by President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, to comments posted on this blog by readers who are concerned about the credit union's financial standing.
As we've recently reported, President Wiggington has refused to post the credit union's Monthly Income Statement for March 2009, despite the fact he is required to do so under State law. The reasons for his refusal are two-fold. The first is that his refusal is a demonstration that he has sufficient power to defy law and not publicize information that could find its way to the Internet.
The second reason is that he doesn't want proof that Priority One is failing, made public. Evidence of failure would bring into question his frequent declarations that business is growing and the credit union, prospering. President Wiggington has often proven that he is not a realist, choosing to cleave to a personal belief system that must insist that things are great when they're clearly not.
We were able to publish the credit union's financials obtained from their quarterly Financial Performance Report ("FPR") before last Thursdays', all-staff meeting conducted at the main branch. Before we go on, here is the message published by the credit union on its webpage:
Annual Meeting Notice
Wednesday May 27, 2009
The annual meeting of Priority One Credit Union will be held Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 6:00 PM. The meeting will be held at South Pasadena Headquarters 1631 Huntington Drive South Pasadena, CA 91030.
At the meeting, the CEO will report on the status of the Credit Union. In addition, the results of our election will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the Credit Union’s bylaws, notice was given to the membership that Nominations by Petition were sought for one (1) vacancy on the Board of Directors, and two (2) vacancies on the Supervisory Committee. Nominations for these vacancies closed at midnight on February 28, 2009, and no nominations by petitions were received. Thus, in accordance with the bylaws, the nominees selected by the Nominating Committee for each of the positions will be deemed elected. Except as provided above, no other new business will be conducted at the Annual Meeting.
Priority One Credit Union.
.
This is the first time the credit union has provided such a detailed account of the nomination process on its website. In fact, its unprecedented. The message is a response to our posts, describing interference of the electoral process by President Wiggington and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks. The two officers tried limiting publication of the notice inviting members to submit themselves as nominees for the upcoming election. Last month, an emergency meeting was conducted in South Pasadena during which the Board and Supervisory Committee tried to forge a response to our expose'. They decided that they would have to expand publication of the invitation which the President and Board Chair originally limited to only members who have checking accounts.
But this certainly isn't the first-time the Credit Union has reacted to our reporting. The President finally published March's Monthly Income Statement which he had said would be made public during the May 2009 Annual Meeting. His intent was illegal and after being exposed of this, published the report.
A few days before the all-staffing was scheduled to take place, Human Resources had every employee sign agreements that state they understand they cannot disclose confidential information divulged during the upcoming meeting and that if doing so, will result in disciplinary action.
A second document issued to all employees informs employees that that they must report violations of confidentiality perpetrated by co-workers.
Though the documents are intended to stop the disclosure of confidential information, we know that no all information dispensed during an all-staff meeting is deemed confidential. So how is the credit union going to differentiate which information is confidential and which is not? We doubt, they will take the time to do so.
Employees cannot be coerced into reporting co-workers who they believe may have violated confidentiality. The credit union is creating a wonderful dynamic in which to breed divisiveness and carryout witch hunts.
During the all-staff meeting, employees where informed that breaches of confidentiality will result in terminations, lawsuits and heavy fines. The fact is, Priority One cannot determine if heavy fines will be ordered. That's up to a judge. Furthermore, unless the breach makes public trade secrets and information that serves to undermine business, it is highly unlikely Priority One can file a lawsuit, except one that is frivolous.
In 2007, President Wiggington spent months traipsing about the main branch and telling whoever he could force to listen, about about the employees he'd already terminated, why he terminated them and which employees he planned on terminating. His statements were not only a violation of credit union policy, they were a violation of state law.
In 2007, the President promoted Liz Campos to the post of AVP even though she had incurred more than 24 separate NSF incidents to her credit union checking account during the months of September 2006 through January 2007. An investigation proved she had been kiting- a federal offense.
In 2008, an investigation proved President Wiggington was guilty of sexual harassment, another federal offense. He should have been tried, but Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, exhausted all channels to ensure the evidence was squashed and the President, reinstated.
The President and the Board Chair recently violated state law when they purposely limited the posting of notices announcing the upcoming election and invitation to members, that they nominate themselves to run for any of the available sets on the Board of Directors and/or Supervisory Committee. Our expose' forced them to restart the electoral process or at a financial cost to the credit union.
The forms distributed by the credit union are an act of hypocrisy. Evidently, the President and the equally hypocritical Board and Supervisory Committee have delued themselves into believing they are exempt from abiding to to credit union policies and state and federal laws.
The credit union paid for Kian Mashirzadeh of Turner, Warren, Hwang and Conrad, the credit union's external auditor, to come and speak at the all-staff meeting. Mr. Kian spoke about the importance of guarding confidentiality and distributed a handout, titled "The Member is King". One page of the handout was titled, "Trust and Integrity" and contains the following sentence:
We are here because the members trust us" and "Indeed this is the standard for all credit unions."
Unfortunately, Kian was either ignorant about the behaviors of the President and the Board or as a paid consultant chose to ignore these. Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has consistently proven that members are unimportant to him. In 2007, he ordered diminished focus on obtaining business from the credit union's largest membership group- employees of the United States Postal Service despite the fact Priority One was founded by a group of Postal Carriers or that employees of the postal service have demonstrated unwavering allegiance to the credit union.
Unlike his predecessor, the honorable, William E. Harris, President Wiggington never responds to calls and letters received from members. He always delegates these for response to employees of the Member Services Department or Business Development Department.
On another page of Kian's handout, is the statement that members should expect "good service", "competitive dividend rates," "competitive loan rates," and that "the member has a right to privacy." President Wiggington's chronic need to violate confidentiality proves he is unconcerned by privacy. In 2007, it was he who ignored security protocols and allowed ballots to be mailed in envelopes on whose exterior were printed member credit union account and social security numbers.
Kian also spoke about HIPPA laws which govern the confidentialisty of personnel records. In his handout, it states that non-compliance to HIPPA and other state and federal laws may incur consequences to the violator and that civil liability damages can be as much as $2500 per violation and totaling up to a possible $500,000 in addition to damages set "irrespective of the amount of damages suffered by the consumer as a result of that violation." The handout also states that "Knowing and willful violations will likewise he subject to civil damages of up to $2500 per violation, BUT THERE IS NO LIMIT ON THE LEVEL OF DAMAGES PER OCCURRENCE FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS.
its not that the information provided by Kian is untrue or inaccurate, its that we have not seen the President sanctions for his many disclosures which publicly reveals the reasons he terminated staff or his statements disparaging personnel. Maybe Kian can take a moment to explain why President Wiggington has not been sued for his slanderous comments concerning Whitni Johnson, Lynnette Fortson, William E. Harris, Maggie Rios, Liz Campos, Aaron Cavazos, Kim Burke, C. Freed, and D. Centeno?
If any member wishes to know what information is to be dispensed during the annual meeting, we suggest they visit the main branch in South Pasadena to request a copy of Priority One's by-laws. Information contained in the bylaws includes instruction for the removal of Directors and Supervisors. Only member-owners possess the power to bring an end to the abusive proclivities of the credit union's disastrous and unethical Board and it is only they, who can bring an end to a President who is obsessed with violating policies and laws and who uses lying as part of his armament to defend his many egregious acts.
At Priority One.Credit Union, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has chosen to conduct himself as King when he in fact is nothing more than a court jester.
The fool is never satisfied and is often viewed as anti-social and misanthropic and wants others to join him in what he does.
Michael R. Jones, Minister
Kindly Share The Love»»
|
|
|
Tweet | Save on Delicious |
15 comments:
I am so confused!!! Last week the company had Kian speak about violations of the privacy act. Afterwards Robert West talked about having a healthy attitude and not reacting negatively to the abuses committed by your employer.
If violating the privacy act is illegal then why is Charles still at the credit union? If committing sexual harassment is illegal then why is Charles still at the credit union? If slandering people is illegal then why is Charles still at the credit union?
What Mr West said was just so illogical. Simply if your employer abuses your just keep a good attitude. What the hell?
I called and asked for the bylaws but the person I spoke to did not know who to get me a copy. She said she never heard of the bylaws.
I disagree with a lot of the comments on this blog. Charles has worked to achieve something. And I know you migh disagree but he has met many of his goals. If you visit http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches.htm you will see that Priority One received recognition because of Charles and no one else.
Go down to the May 31, 2007
and you will see that Priority One snet out election ballots to members with social security number and account numbers printed on the outside of the envelopes. So you see Charles did accomplish something.
Congrats Charles. Hope this helps.
This is Regarding the election ballots that went out in May 2007. This event was one of the most embarrassing for p1cu. Nitwit Baldy left the members and employees social security #'s on the outside of envelopes. What a dope! hoooorrray charlie you are #1 !!!
I was still employed at p1cu when this happened. Charles blamed Alan Santos (former employee-computer tech)for another one of his silly errors.you know baldy he wants to be known as perfect. I remember Alan was so upset, humiliated and pissed off because Stupid asshole Charles blamed him for this mistake. A lot of us employees knew it was Charles fault, none of us were surprised he blamed Alan. This was just another one of Baldy's childish games, what a Wimp, Charles does not have the _____ to fess up to what he did, and never will. He has no damn GUTTS! i see him as the type of person that would hide behind his grandma's skirt when he does something wrong or even behind Roger's skirt like he does so now.GROW UP BALDY AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!
To the authur of this blogg, it appears you are losing your following. You are a fuckin idiot if you thought you would succeed in ruining our President and CEO Mr. Charles Wigginggton reputation. The only thing you accomplished is looking to stupid. We know who you are and your days at P1 are numbered. Take that an report it on our financial record as getting rid of you, the liability.
Anonymous wrote:
"To the authur of this blogg, it appears you are losing your following. You are a fuckin idiot if you thought you would succeed in ruining our President and CEO Mr. Charles Wigginggton reputation. The only thing you accomplished is looking to stupid. We know who you are and your days at P1 are numbered. Take that an report it on our financial record as getting rid of you, the liability."
The email sent by "Anonymous" is colorful in its use of substandard English and an amazing attestation to the caliber of person who deems Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. worthy of respect.
I would like to begin by pointing out some errors which serve to create a profile of the author's limited intellect. Experts have often pointed out, that the use of profanity in writing, particularly in the context of asserting one's opinion, usually points to a limited intellectual capacity.
First...
"To the authur of this blogg, it appears you are losing your following."
If you had taken the time to look at the numbers which appear at the top of the green column on the right side of my posts, you would have found that the blog has generated a rather large and loyal following.
Second....
"You are a fuckin idiot if you thought you would succeed in ruining our President and CEO Mr. Charles Wigginggton reputation."
If the commentator possessed the comprehension of a Cappucine monkey, he or she may have been able to differentiate between an expose' and a campaign intended to slander with unfounded allegations, the reputation of Mr. Wiggington.
This expose' of actual wrongdoing is substantiated by documented evidence and witness testaments. To the commentator, these at least possess sufficient legal substantiation to prove my contentions versus your profane spewings.
"The only thing you
accomplished is looking to [DID YOU MEAN, 'TOO'?] stupid. We know who you are and your days at P1 are numbered."
THREATS? RETALIATION? VENGENCE? POSSIBLE COLLUSION AND COERCION? How exciting. Hmmm, are you a board member or Charles Wiggington,himself?
"Take that an report it on our financial record as getting rid of you, the liability."
Actually, my sub-intellectual friend, I am unable to post anything on Priority One's financials. As I wrote in an early post,
Interestingly enough, the troglodyte who authored this comment submitted their opinion only two days after I wrote about the credit union's effort to control the upcoming Annual Meeting, scheduled to take place on 5/27/09 at the South Pasadena office. Reacting so vehemently to my post? Did I touch a nerve?
This is the caliber of person who is drawn to Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. Evidently, a person with an inability to read and comprehend. A person who finds justification for the violations of company policy, acts of slander, persecution of employees, CONTINUOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES GOVERNING CONFIDENTIALITY
and even, the act of confiscating a member's vehicle and transferring ownership to himself.
Well, anonymous, all I can suggest is that you go back and complete Elementary School so your next comment can at least reflect some semblance of intelligence. As I wrote in my post, Mrs. Rios, Ms. Burke and the many other employees who were slandered by Charles R. Wiggington, Sr., according to the Kian, the representative of the credit union's accounting firm, with substantial prove, such as witness testimonies, you may file a lawsuit againt the always undisciplined president.
Hey anonymous, I mean idiot you spelled Charlie's name as Wigginggton and wrote fuckin.
Why don't you post your comments when you learn how to spell. THE NAME IS WIGGINGTON NOT WIGGINGGTON! IDIOT!
Sounds like Wiggy babe to me. John, sue them if they try to do something to you. Ask trhe court for his BMW's and then give then away to some organization that helps those in need.
Hey anonymous. You are a punk! Nothing but a big mouth punk.
A lot of us got screwed over by Charles so why don't you shut your big mouth. And if you Charles, SHUT YOUR BIG MOUTH!
REMEMBER CYNTHIA TILLER.
YOU DON'T KISS AND TELL BUT YOU SURE KISS AND FIRE.
I CAN STILL REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED IN YOUR OFFICE.
This goes to the moron who is having an anxiety attack over this blog. You know, the person who commented using the name "anonymous." First, make it a habit of visting your local library, they offer 6th graders free tutoring in spelling.
You wrote "authur" did you mean "Arthur"? If not, authur is actually spelled "AUTHOR"!!!
Wiggy Brain, I think you are anonymous! Come on, don't hide. I mean you backstabbed Kim Burke, Maggie Rios, stole Mr. Wafa's car, got rid of Aaron, and so and so and so on. Why are you offended? Truth gets you rattled?
I wrote previously that you like to hide behind Roger's granny skirt. Remember? Do you feel like being exposed is a punch in your fat, wide nose?
No one gets this upset unless something has struck a sore spot. Since you're a liar, the truth would probably hurt.
Wiggy Brain, this blog has been the GREATEST thing that has ever happened to Priority One. You have finally be "exposed" for all your illegal acts. If I were you I would jump of a bridge or move far, far away, so that you don't have to bother human kind anymore.
YOUR DAYS AT P1 ARE OVER, BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONLY LIABILITY AT THE CREDIT UNION.
HA, HA! Even your current employees want to see you go. Everyone at the credit union knows you're no good and worthless! Did you know that a lot of the people in the credit union don't like you either? Bet you did not know just how much you are disliked, did you?
It would be so much easier if you packed your crap and slithered out of P1.
One last thing, Wiggy. ALL THE EVIDENCE HAS BEEN COLLECTED. IT HAS YOUR NAME/SIGNATURE AND ON LEGAL DOCUMENTS NO LESS.
I was there when you told Mike Lee to go ahead and repossess Mr. Wafa's car. I was there when you guys faked the documents to show on file that you sent the vehicle to auction, but you took the car and transferred ownership to your name. It became your car only on paper because you know you took what didn't belong to you!
GOOD-BYE and GOOD RIDDENCE. WOULDN'T WANT TO BE YOU, WIGGY.
The other day I walked into the office on Central and Gage and screamed. What I saw was horrible! What I thought was Travis the Chimp was actually the Branch Manager. You know who I am talking about Ms. Fugly. Please someone tell that woman to grow some hair, it won't take all the ugliness away but at least she would look a little better.....hehehehehe
Charles! Are you stuck on stupid? Didn't I teach you better? When will you learn, if you're going to slander people, don't advertise what you did all over the credit union? I am putting you up for adoption. Good-bye.
Well this has to open up a can of worms.
FIRST, OF ALL, MEMBERS of any credit union are its OWNERS! They have every right to speak up if they so choose.
SECONDLY, in an election you have 90 days to call and wait for nominations to be submitted.
After this, the announcement has to be sent to ALL the membership NOT JUST THE SHARE DRAFT members. THE ENTIRE MEMBERSHIP!
There ARE always 3 seats open and up for re-election.
If a board member leaves the board or a vacant seat becomes available, then that seat must be filled. The person who would be placed in the vacant seat is the candidate who ran and did not make it on the board, but had the next highest number of votes.
CASE IN POINT, THOMS GATHERS WHO IS C0NVALESCING AND UNABLE TO ATTEND BOARD MEETINGS. THE PERSON WHO WOULD TAKE HIS SEAT IS JAMES SMITH!
AND THIS IS FOR DIEDRA AND WIGG! DID YOU TWO FORGET THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? THIS IS NOT THE REPUBLIC OF DIEDRALAND OR CHARLESVILLE!
EVERY MEMBER NEEDS TO MAKE AN EFFORT TO ATTEND THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING AND SPEAK UP ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON!
IF CHARLES DENIES HE TOOK MR. WAFA'S CAR OR SAYS THE BLOG IS A LIE, THEN THERE WILL BE PLENTY OF WITNESSES WHO CAN TESTIFY AT HIS TRIAL.
WIGGY, HAVE I GOT A SURPRISE FOR YOU. I CONTACTED A FORMER MEMBER WHO WILL BE ATTENDING THE MEETING TO ASK YOU SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS CAR. I HOPE YOU'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO THE ANNUAL MEETING AS MUCH AS I AM.
Anonymous you wrote, "To the authur of this blogg, it appears you are losing your following. You are a fuckin idiot if you thought you would succeed in ruining our President and CEO Mr. Charles Wigginggton reputation. The only thing you accomplished is looking to stupid. We know who you are and your days at P1 are numbered. Take that an report it on our financial record as getting rid of you, the liability."
You sound so much like Charles though it is possible you could be Diedra or maybe one of Charles' kids.
Let's get it straight, Charles or whoever you are, we at P1 are waiting for a new post each day. I don't anyone who has been abused and mistreated by Charles who has not found themselves feeling liberated by this blog.
Unlike the one and only defender of Charles, a lot of us feel Wigg had it coming and pray and hope justice is eventually served and he is terminated or asked to leave. He is the only liability at P1. Case in point: More than $3 million in the red.
Some of us have worked here a long time and know what the credit union was like before Charles and what it has become under Charles.
We were a good solid place to work at. We were happy and enjoyed coming to work. When Wigg took over, this place became HELL and everyone HATES this place including the members who often complain that this place used to be nice.
And Wigg, what do you think is going to happen when you retaliate? Don't you think more of us will rise up. That will down your house faster than anything you can imagine.
So big mouth watch out because WE ARE ALL WATCHING U
CHARLES.
Charles are you threatening someone again? Typical coward. Well, I know you wrote that ignorant little ghetto message. Way to feed the stereotype you moron.
Let me tell you what Charles is trying to do at Priority One. He wants to fire employees he thinks are posting on this blog. He plans to fire employees using credit union policy and privacy laws.
First, he had all employees sign documents that say that if they release confidential information they can be fired. He also had them sign another form which says they can turn their co-workers into HR who they think have exposed confidential info.
By having every employee sign the documents he has carried out his responsibility that employees have been warned about the consequences. He is trying to turn employee against employee and getting evidence he needs to fire people.
The other day he told Diedra, while talking to her on his cell phone just outside the side door of the credit union, who he thinks John is. He told her how he plans to trap the employee and fire him. WHY DOESN’T HE SHUT UP?
There is no one on earth except Diedra, O. Glen, Cornelia and maybe his momma, who think Charles is all that.
Charles, you and I know you wrote that little message. Why would you threaten someone in writing? Oh wait, because you're an idiot!
Hey Charles, remember how you turned on Kim Burke when Aaron demoted her and abused her? Remember how you turned on Whitni Johnson when Aaron decided he did not want her at South Pasadena? Remember how you were mad at her because she didn't want you touching her? Remember how you even ran over to HR and wanted her written up for rejecting your touch? Remember how you turned on David Quinones when he sent a letter to HR complaining about Aaron's invitations to clubs? By the way, these 3 and a lot of other employees complained to HR about you and Aaron. According to the policy, HR is supposed to investigate complaints and then tell the employees how their complaint was resolved. How come none of them ever heard from HR? Isn't that a violation of policy and labor law? How come no one in HR write down complaints when they are reported? I know they don’t have photographic memories.
Come on anonymous I mean Charles, do something new and answer questions truthfully.
I looked at P1's Employee Handbook and on page 2 under #B, it describes what the credit union is supposed to do when an employee files a complaint. It says....
"You should report every instance of unlawful discrimination or harassment to your Manager, or the Vice President of Human Resources or the President of the Credit Union, regardless of whether you or someone else is subject of the discrimination."
Well, Kim Burke complained about Charles before she was fired and she filed a complaint that she had been sexually harassed by DIEDRA HARRIS-BROOKS wrote her a letter saying Kim participated in the exchange between her and Mr. Wiggington though Diedra also wrote that Mr. Wiggington behaved inappropriately. Then the board reinstated him. SO WHY WOULD ANYONE FILE A COMPLAINT WITH HUMAN RESOURCES, A MANAGER, OR THE PRESIDENT? Kian told employee they could trust the board. Yeah, trust Diedra and she'll make sure you get abused and fired.
The policy also says....
"Detailed reports-- including names, descritpions, and actual events or statements made-- will greatly enhance the credit union's ability to investigate."
Really. Like when you investigated complaints against Aaron Cavazos and Georgina Duenas. Who treated people horribly and used to conduct his work for his second job, at Priority One. He even brought his customers from his other business to the credit union. And Georgina has committed fraud for years, asking her co-workers to clock her in when she takes one of her more than 60 minute daily lunches. She also has taken 30-45 minutes every day for years and years and years and yet HR the department thats supposed to investigate complaints has allowed her and allowed Aaron to get away with murder. Though HR does allow some employees to be written up. Isn't that discrimination?
The policy also says....
"Based on your report, the credit union will conduct an investigation." Ah, no they won't!
"The credit union prohibits any and all retaliation for submitted a report of unlawful discrimination and for cooperating in any investigation." Really, because a lot of us saw what Aaron did to Kim and what he tried to do to Whitni and David. The credit union policy should say, "The credit union encourages retaliation." That little post by Charles threatening John is a good example of how honest P1's management is. They're not!!
The policy also says...
"Any manager or employee who retaliates against the accuser or those involved in the investigation wil be disclinplined up to and including discharge from employment."
THAT'S A LIE. Several employees have reported and written letters to HR about being retaliated and nothing happened to the managers. For example, after all the complaints filed against Aaron including statements that one day he would fire Maggie Rios, Charles promoted Aaron.
The policy also says....
Any Manager or Employees who retalizates against the accuser or those involved in the investigation will be disciplined, up to and including discharge from employment."
Really? How come Aaron got promoted? How come Georgina's never been written up? How come Charles is still president. Lies, lies, lies.
The last part of the paragraph says...
"You will be informed of whatever actions(s) the credit union takes to reslve and remedy the situation."
ANOTHER LIE! At no time has HR ever taken notes when any employee has ever gone to the office to tell them about a problem they are having with a manager. In fact, Rodger always makes excuses like, "Maybe you heard incorrectly" or "He was just joking" or "I think you're imagining the whole thing." Why would anyone trust HR?
ALSO, NO EMPLOYEE HAS EVER BEEN TOLD WHAT ACTION WAS TAKEN TO RESOLVE THEIR COMPLAINT. THE LABOR BOARD NEEDS TO AUDIT EVERY PAST AND PRESENT EMPLOYEE FILE WHICH WILL SHOW NO NOTES BY HR DOCUMENTING COMPLAINTS OR WHAT THEY DID TO RESOLVE THE COMPLAINT. I BET THERE IS NOTHING NOTED ABOUT WHAT KIM TOLD RODGER OR ABOUT WHAT THEY DID WHEN WHITNI TOLD THEM ABOUT THE WAY SHE WAS BEING TREATED BY AARON. HOW ABOUT THE TIME DOROTHY TOLD THEM ABOUT WHAT AARON WAS DOING INT HE DEPARTMENT? AND WHAT ABOUT THE LETTER DAVID WROTE ABOUT AARON AND GEORGINA. IF YOU ASK THESE EMPLOYEES THEY WILL ALL TELL YOU THAT NO ONE EVER TOLD THEM HOW THEIR COMPLAINTS WERE SETTLED. AND I KNOW THEY WILL ALL SAY THAT RODGER NEVER WROTE DOWN THEIR COMPLAINTS WHEN THEY MET WITH HIM.
AND ANYWAY, WHAT CAN HR DO WHEN THEY'RE SCARED OF FAT OLD CHARLES WIGGINGTON.
THEY HAVE DONE MORE THAN SCREW OVER P1'S FINANCIALS, THEY HAVE SCREWED OVER GOOD EMPLOYEES.
Post a Comment