THE ANNOUNCEMENT
We had a completely different post in mind but were diverted by a notice posted last week on Priority One Credit Union's website. The message announced that the credit union's Annual Meeting will take place at the main branch in south Pasadena, California on May 27, 2009, starting at 6 p.m.
The notice appears to be a reaction by President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, to comments posted on this blog by readers who are concerned about the credit union's financial standing.
As we've recently reported, President Wiggington has refused to post the credit union's Monthly Income Statement for March 2009, despite the fact he is required to do so under State law. The reasons for his refusal are two-fold. The first is that his refusal is a demonstration that he has sufficient power to defy law and not publicize information that could find its way to the Internet.
The second reason is that he doesn't want proof that Priority One is failing, made public. Evidence of failure would bring into question his frequent declarations that business is growing and the credit union, prospering. President Wiggington has often proven that he is not a realist, choosing to cleave to a personal belief system that must insist that things are great when they're clearly not.
We were able to publish the credit union's financials obtained from their quarterly Financial Performance Report ("FPR") before last Thursdays', all-staff meeting conducted at the main branch. Before we go on, here is the message published by the credit union on its webpage:
Annual Meeting Notice
Wednesday May 27, 2009
The annual meeting of Priority One Credit Union will be held Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 6:00 PM. The meeting will be held at South Pasadena Headquarters 1631 Huntington Drive South Pasadena, CA 91030.
At the meeting, the CEO will report on the status of the Credit Union. In addition, the results of our election will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with the Credit Union’s bylaws, notice was given to the membership that Nominations by Petition were sought for one (1) vacancy on the Board of Directors, and two (2) vacancies on the Supervisory Committee. Nominations for these vacancies closed at midnight on February 28, 2009, and no nominations by petitions were received. Thus, in accordance with the bylaws, the nominees selected by the Nominating Committee for each of the positions will be deemed elected. Except as provided above, no other new business will be conducted at the Annual Meeting.
Priority One Credit Union.
.
This is the first time the credit union has provided such a detailed account of the nomination process on its website. In fact, its unprecedented. The message is a response to our posts, describing interference of the electoral process by President Wiggington and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks. The two officers tried limiting publication of the notice inviting members to submit themselves as nominees for the upcoming election. Last month, an emergency meeting was conducted in South Pasadena during which the Board and Supervisory Committee tried to forge a response to our expose'. They decided that they would have to expand publication of the invitation which the President and Board Chair originally limited to only members who have checking accounts.
But this certainly isn't the first-time the Credit Union has reacted to our reporting. The President finally published March's Monthly Income Statement which he had said would be made public during the May 2009 Annual Meeting. His intent was illegal and after being exposed of this, published the report.
A few days before the all-staffing was scheduled to take place, Human Resources had every employee sign agreements that state they understand they cannot disclose confidential information divulged during the upcoming meeting and that if doing so, will result in disciplinary action.
A second document issued to all employees informs employees that that they must report violations of confidentiality perpetrated by co-workers.
Though the documents are intended to stop the disclosure of confidential information, we know that no all information dispensed during an all-staff meeting is deemed confidential. So how is the credit union going to differentiate which information is confidential and which is not? We doubt, they will take the time to do so.
Employees cannot be coerced into reporting co-workers who they believe may have violated confidentiality. The credit union is creating a wonderful dynamic in which to breed divisiveness and carryout witch hunts.
During the all-staff meeting, employees where informed that breaches of confidentiality will result in terminations, lawsuits and heavy fines. The fact is, Priority One cannot determine if heavy fines will be ordered. That's up to a judge. Furthermore, unless the breach makes public trade secrets and information that serves to undermine business, it is highly unlikely Priority One can file a lawsuit, except one that is frivolous.
In 2007, President Wiggington spent months traipsing about the main branch and telling whoever he could force to listen, about about the employees he'd already terminated, why he terminated them and which employees he planned on terminating. His statements were not only a violation of credit union policy, they were a violation of state law.
In 2007, the President promoted Liz Campos to the post of AVP even though she had incurred more than 24 separate NSF incidents to her credit union checking account during the months of September 2006 through January 2007. An investigation proved she had been kiting- a federal offense.
In 2008, an investigation proved President Wiggington was guilty of sexual harassment, another federal offense. He should have been tried, but Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, exhausted all channels to ensure the evidence was squashed and the President, reinstated.
The President and the Board Chair recently violated state law when they purposely limited the posting of notices announcing the upcoming election and invitation to members, that they nominate themselves to run for any of the available sets on the Board of Directors and/or Supervisory Committee. Our expose' forced them to restart the electoral process or at a financial cost to the credit union.
The forms distributed by the credit union are an act of hypocrisy. Evidently, the President and the equally hypocritical Board and Supervisory Committee have delued themselves into believing they are exempt from abiding to to credit union policies and state and federal laws.
The credit union paid for Kian Mashirzadeh of Turner, Warren, Hwang and Conrad, the credit union's external auditor, to come and speak at the all-staff meeting. Mr. Kian spoke about the importance of guarding confidentiality and distributed a handout, titled "The Member is King". One page of the handout was titled, "Trust and Integrity" and contains the following sentence:
We are here because the members trust us" and "Indeed this is the standard for all credit unions."
Unfortunately, Kian was either ignorant about the behaviors of the President and the Board or as a paid consultant chose to ignore these. Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has consistently proven that members are unimportant to him. In 2007, he ordered diminished focus on obtaining business from the credit union's largest membership group- employees of the United States Postal Service despite the fact Priority One was founded by a group of Postal Carriers or that employees of the postal service have demonstrated unwavering allegiance to the credit union.
Unlike his predecessor, the honorable, William E. Harris, President Wiggington never responds to calls and letters received from members. He always delegates these for response to employees of the Member Services Department or Business Development Department.
On another page of Kian's handout, is the statement that members should expect "good service", "competitive dividend rates," "competitive loan rates," and that "the member has a right to privacy." President Wiggington's chronic need to violate confidentiality proves he is unconcerned by privacy. In 2007, it was he who ignored security protocols and allowed ballots to be mailed in envelopes on whose exterior were printed member credit union account and social security numbers.
Kian also spoke about HIPPA laws which govern the confidentialisty of personnel records. In his handout, it states that non-compliance to HIPPA and other state and federal laws may incur consequences to the violator and that civil liability damages can be as much as $2500 per violation and totaling up to a possible $500,000 in addition to damages set "irrespective of the amount of damages suffered by the consumer as a result of that violation." The handout also states that "Knowing and willful violations will likewise he subject to civil damages of up to $2500 per violation, BUT THERE IS NO LIMIT ON THE LEVEL OF DAMAGES PER OCCURRENCE FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS.
its not that the information provided by Kian is untrue or inaccurate, its that we have not seen the President sanctions for his many disclosures which publicly reveals the reasons he terminated staff or his statements disparaging personnel. Maybe Kian can take a moment to explain why President Wiggington has not been sued for his slanderous comments concerning Whitni Johnson, Lynnette Fortson, William E. Harris, Maggie Rios, Liz Campos, Aaron Cavazos, Kim Burke, C. Freed, and D. Centeno?
If any member wishes to know what information is to be dispensed during the annual meeting, we suggest they visit the main branch in South Pasadena to request a copy of Priority One's by-laws. Information contained in the bylaws includes instruction for the removal of Directors and Supervisors. Only member-owners possess the power to bring an end to the abusive proclivities of the credit union's disastrous and unethical Board and it is only they, who can bring an end to a President who is obsessed with violating policies and laws and who uses lying as part of his armament to defend his many egregious acts.
At Priority One.Credit Union, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has chosen to conduct himself as King when he in fact is nothing more than a court jester.
The fool is never satisfied and is often viewed as anti-social and misanthropic and wants others to join him in what he does.
Michael R. Jones, Minister