Next Post

NEXT POST WILL BE PUBLISHED ON OR
AROUND June 7, 2016.

SHOWN TO THE RIGHT, ARE THE CONTENTS OF THE 11/27/12 LETTER SIGNED BY PRIORITY ONE CREDIT UNION PRESIDENT, CHARLES R. WIGGINGTON, SR. IN COMPLIANCE TO THE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREED TO BY THE CREDIT UNION AND A MEMBER WHO SUED THE CREDIT UNION, ALLEGING THEIR WILLFUL VIOLATION OF THE PRIVACY ACT.

Our Readership: U .S., Ukraine, Russia, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Malta, Malaysia, Laos, Canada, Greece, Turkey, Sweden, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Isle of Man, Portugal, Morocco and more!

Translate

SEARCH THIS SITE

Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts

Friday, February 17, 2012

“We have never been sued.”– Charles R. Wiggington, Sr., President, Part One


Priority One Credit Union ended 2011 in the BLACK. This is a huge improvement over 2008, 2009, and 2010, during which it ended each of those years immersed in the negative. 






Black could suggest that President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has finally implemented strategies that are generated increased new business and amassing profit, but this isn't the case. Stabilization of the credit union's financial standing can be attributed in great part to the closure of the Redlands and Valencia branches in 2010, the closure of the Riverside branch in 2011, and the drastic reduction of budgets and elimination of employee benefits.

Last November and December 2011, the President visited some of the credit union's remaining branches and told employees that Priority One is experiencing a resurgence in business. To lend credence to his claims, the President said net capital had increased well above 6%. Net capital is not necessarily the result of increased new business. The President's "story" was just another lie perpetrated to dupe employees.


However, the President's proclamations of success came to an abrupt end at the start of January 2012. During several meetings with managers, the President admitted Priority One is in deep financial straits and that unless lots of new business is gotten by the start of February 2012, the credit union may have to close the Burbank branch. The President lied again. Unbeknownst to most employees, the President called the management company overseeing the property where the Burbank branch is located and informed them that the branch will have to close by the end of May 2012. 


Over the last six months, the President has carried on a campaign in which publicly states that our reports are all untrue and maliciously motivated to smear his "good character." Amongst our statements that he has labeled untrue, are:
  • The credit union has never been sued by any former employee.
  • He has never been accused or investigated for allegedly sexually harassing a female employee. 
  • The credit union has not suffered financial setbacks at anytime over the past five years. 
His statements are of course, all untrue.




SETTLEMENT

Priority One has settled the lawsuit filed by former Burbank Branch Manager, Linda Nisely. Not only was the settlement entered into voluntarily by the credit union but it was the credit union's often arrogant attorney, Paul F. Schimley of Richardson Harman Ober who called the Plaintiff's attorney and requested that they meet to hammer out a settlement agreement. 

So what happened the Mr. Schimley's boastings verbalized week after week over the past few months, proclaiming that his firm had acquired evidence and testimonies from current and former employees which would expose Mrs. Nisely of being a racist and of being insubordinate and unwilling to carryout her assigned responsibilities? And what about Mr. Schimley's insistence that labeling the lawsuit "frivolous" and without merit?

The Plaintiff and the credit union have agreed through a signed agreement, that neither will divulge any information which might serve to malign either party or to publicly discuss the term so the settlement. Unfortunately for the credit union, Director of Project Management, Yvonne Boutte, could not refrain from making comments about the settlement. 

According to Mrs. Boutte, the Plaintiff used a part of the money from the settlement to pay-off her delinquent Priority One loan. Mrs. Boutte also disclosed that for months prior to entering into a settlement agreement with the credit union, when calling Mrs. Nisely to demand she submit payment against her delinquent credit union loan, she would tell collection representatives, "I am a former employee and I'm suing the credit union.”

The reason why the credit union anxiously sought to settle the lawsuit has little to do with evidence provided by Mrs. Nisely supporting her insistence she was terminated because of her age and race. In fact, for all intents and purposes, her case was highly deficient and for awhile, it appeared it could be dismissed. 

The greatest flaw in her case, was Mrs. Nisely herself. There is no denying, she was a caustic presence while employed by the credit union. During the few years of her employment, she smeared the reputations of many staff members. And she indeed, often show a disdain towards Latins. She did spend her days playing on the Internet and not working it her alleged medical condition which she said precluded her from physically leaving the Burbank branch to visit the community served by that office was never substantiated by medical records. As far as we know, it was a pretext she used to justify her stay in the branch. No, Linda Nisely wasn't so nice. 

Mrs. Nisely's case was aided by a copy of a letter, written by the last Valencia Branch Manager to the credit union in which were documented abuses perpetrated by former COO, Beatrice Walker, and which President Charles R. Wiggington, Sr.; Executive Vice President, Rodger Smock; and Board Chair, Diedra Harris-Brooks, refused to stop. It was the credit union's refusal to stop Ms. Walker's heinous campaign which proved lethal to the credit union's planned defense. The following record, obtained from the Los Angeles Superior Court, confirms dismissal of Mrs. Nisely’s lawsuit.

The Request for Entry of Dismissal (with prejudice) confirms that the lawsuit has been resolved. Congratulations to the former Burbank Branch Manager and her highly competent attorney. As for Mr. Schimley, he should try to control his addictive need to boast prematurely of successes which just never seem to occur. 


"WE HAVE NEVER BEEN SUED"

President Wiggington's latest campaign is intended to dupe employees, members and anyone else who will listen to his dribble, that Priority One has never been sued by any former employee. The President's foolhardy campaign ignores the fact that there is physical evidence proving Priority One has indeed been sued by more than one employee. Either the President is living in denial, delusional or just outright lying.Here is a Case Summary describing the motions filed in Mrs. Nisely's lawsuit:









Well it looks like the credit union was indeed sued by Mrs. Nisely a former employee which should dispel any confusion by the President that Priority One has never been sued by any former employees.


"I've never been accused of sexual harassment"

President Wiggington is not only a man who refuses to be accountable for his vast failures but he is one who is mired in denial. In his latest campaign, he has tried to convince employees that the accusations that he was accused by a former employee of sexually harassing her for several years is completely and utterly untrue. Of course, like his denial that any former employee has sued the credit union, his denial that he was ever accused of sexual harassment is also untrue. Here is a copy of the letter, written, signed and hand delivered to the President following an investigation of allegations he sexually harassed a former employee.






The letter should job President Wiggington's memory and help dispel any confusion he may have regarding whether or not he was ever accused of sexually harassing an employee.


EXTINCTION

Due to President's Wiggington's inability to develop sound strategical measures, Priority One remains mired in metaphorical tar pit and in the process of continual decline. Last month, President Wiggington met with employees and managers and ordered that they exert all efforts to obtain immense amounts of new business over the next eight weeks or he would have order lay-offs, further reduce budgets and even move to close the Burbank branch. . 

Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. is again, being more than just a little delusional. He hopes to achieve in an eight-week period what he has failed to do over a five year period. As usual, when he issued his edict it was unaccompanied by a plan on how he hopes employees will achieve his lofty expectations.

Historically, the Burbank branch has not performed well even under the self-proclaimed business genius of AVP, Sylvia Perez. In fact, the office's decline began with Mrs. Perez's arrival. Throughout 2011, Mrs. Perez boasted that the branch experienced immense amounts of walk-in traffic with a large amount of business generated from Shared Branching transactions. Of course, Mrs. Perez who is not quite the financial expert she'd like people to believe she is, doesn't understand that the obtainment of new business is necessary to produce increased levels of profit needed, in part, to offset overhead and justify the $5200 per month paid to rent the branch location.

In 2009, even the inept and corrupt former COO, Beatrice Walker, realized that the Burbank branch was not producing the level of new business needed to justify its continued operation and at the time, marked it for closure.

In November and December 2011, President Wiggington in company of Senior Vice President, Rodger Smock, frequently visited the Burbank office. The visitations by the two should have been viewed as a harbinger of bad news for the branch and its staff. The two also frequently visited the Valencia branch prior to announcing it's closure.

The fact that Priority One is struggling to pay $5200 a month to rent the Burbank branch speaks volumes about it's financial capabilities and further dispels the chronic insistence by President Wiggington that business is "good" and "growing." Obviously, it's not!

What's more, there is a detrimental impact to the ability of the credit union to do business in the communities where branches are closed. The Burbank branch serves the large, heavily populated eastern regions of the San Fernando Valley and one of the credit union's largest SEG's, St. Joseph Medical Center. Though the credit union does maintain an office in the city of Van Nuys it's location is inconvenient to members residing and working in Burbank. We know that Shared Branching will not be selling point to people who presently utilize the Burbank office.

We've no doubts the Burbank branch will close either in May or June of this year because it is virtually impossible to achieve what the President says is needed in a 30, 60, or 90 day period. If the Burbank branch closes, it will raise net capital which will in turn, enable Priority One to remain in business but it will have absolutely no impact on generating profit from new business though the President deceptively insists it does. It doesn't.

Despite his November and December proclamations that business is increasing by January he seemed genuinely concerned by indicators which threatened to return Priority One into the RED. As of February 2010, President Wiggington is again faced with the same dilemma encountered by the credit union in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011.

On January 5, 2012, during one of the credit union's quarterly all-staff meetings, the President assured employees business was doing well and emphasized the importance of reaching out to the communities served by the credit union. In the days which follow, he did a complete turn about face and while meeting with managers including Senior Vice President, Rodger Smock; CLO, Cindy Garvin; Loan Manager, Joseph Garcia; and Director of Project Management, Yvonne Boutte, expressed deep concern over the credit union's inability to attract new business and seeking suggestions on how to spruce up the credit union's aged loan portfolio without having to actually spend money implementing new products. Unless the President has a magic wand, don't expect any of his directives to be realized.

In response, AVP, Sylvia Perez has begun scouting new more affordable locations where the Burbank branch could potentially relocate to. Mrs. Perez doesn't comprehend or is mired in denial, that the Burbank branch must close to eliminate spending and raise net capital. Relocating the branch to another site is costly and will again require the credit union to pay a monthly lease it cannot afford.

The growing and promising credit union inherited by President Wiggington in 2007 is a thing of the past and will never exist again under Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. His ship shod leadership, unscrupulous acts, his clouded and fantastical so-called "vision" for the credit union, his disregard for members and employees have caused Priority One to lose sight of it's role to members, it's branding and has muddled all perception of it's direction. Let's face it, Priority One is not only ineffective and no longer competitive, it's invisible.


MASKING INTENTS

In January of 2010, at the request of then COO, Beatrice Walker,


In 2011, the President promoted the Assistant to the Loan Manager, Joseph Garcia, to AVP of Sales and Business Development despite the well-documented fact that Mr. Garcia fails at every position he's ever held while employed by the credit union.










According to the President, Mr. Garcia, who over the past year and a half, been stripped of his titles as Credit Manager, Real Estate Loan Manager, and Call Center Supervisor will be implementing changes that will eventually produce large amounts of new business and generate substantial profit for the beleaguered credit union. So how could Mr. Garcia who fails at all that he does, suddenly be imbued with the ability to acquire large amounts of desperately needed new business? It's of course untrue and more wishful thinking by the inept President. Don't expect Mr. Garcia to succeed in his new capacity. He just doesn't have the knowledge, education, or intellect to achieve the goals set for him by the President. He's being setup for failure.

The President may be daft but he's isn't entirely stupid. He knows that his goals for the next 60 to 90 days are unrealistic. So with the assistance of CLO, Cindy Garvin, and Mr. Garcia, the three have created a new plan that contains a twist that will help the credit union reduce spending. It would almost be clever if it weren't so heinous.

Having grown weary of criticisms that he is inept, the President, the CLO, and the newly appointed AVP have assigned monthly sales quotas to every employee, even those employees who never meet with members, i.e., accounting, IT personnel, etc. Employees who fail to achieve their monthly quotas in one month, will be issued written warnings. If they fail to achieve their quotas during two consecutive months, they will be terminated.

By implementing this newest plan, the focus changes from the President to the employee. If employees are terminated, the reason is due to their failures and not the failure of the President. At least that's what the President hopes. Unfortunately, Mr. Wiggington has never provided employees with the tools needed to achieve goals. That's because he has no idea on how to do so. Subsequently, employees will be expected to attain their assigned goals without being taught how they are to realize their assigned directives. This vicious tactic will enable the credit union to reduce spending on salaries and benefits and replace full-time staff with part-time employees who are never paid benefits.

Last month, CLO, Cindy Garvin, posted a memorandum informing all employees that the Call Center staff had acquired 14 automobile loan applications which she said were the result of diligence and hard work. According to Ms. Garvin, if the Call Center could achieve this so could all other employees.

Ms. Garvin was being more than a little dishonest in her assessment of the Call Center's achievement. As Ms. Garvin knows. receipt of a loan application is not synonymous with new business. Following approval of a loan application, members must actually fund the approved loan. At the end of January, the 12 of the automobile loan applications were denied due to poor credit while two remain in pending status which means not one of the applications has been funded. Presumptuous on the part of Ms. Garvin, wasn't it?

The new plan requires that the staff of all branches begin cold calling measures which includes calling members whose applications for loans have been approved. Calls will be made to members at their homes on Wednesday evenings. The business development team and all AVP's and branch managers are now placed under authority of Mr. Garcia. Unless goals are met, the President has vehemently stated he will introduce more drastic measures, including laying-off staff, reducing work hours, and closing the Burbank branch.

Note that the President's new plan utilizes threats and subjects employees to duress all to achieve his ends. Don't expect this latest plan to succeed. Expect more failures, more terminations, and the introduction of more drastic cutting to spending.


STRESS
In December (2011) former Loan Manager, Joseph Garcia, revealed that Chief Loan Officer (“CLO”), Cindy Garvin, was under tremendous stress. Describing Ms. Garvin as a “nice person”, he said she was constantly bombarded with demands by the President, to increase consumer loan funding. Mr. Garcia also recently divulged that Ms. Garvin had been called to a Board meeting and asked why business is not improving. The question is one the Board thought logical in view of their very illogical and unwavering support of President Wiggington over the past five years. It is also a logical question to a Board whose Directors have little comprehension of financials along with their proven ability to circumvent ethics like Superman scales tall buildings in a single bound. It shouldn’t surprise anyone with a modicum of intelligence that the Board believes one person- Ms. Garvin, can come in and unravel the horrendous mess created by President Wiggington, former COO, Beatrice Walker, and Senior Vice President, Rodger Smock. Oh yes, and the messes perpetuated by the Board of Directors under leadership of Chairperson, Diedra Harris-Brooks.

The credit union’s troubles have been further magnified by the revamping of the Real Estate Loan department, which now only finances Home Equity Lines of Credit (“HELOCs”). Applications for all other types of mortgage loans which were until several months ago, funded by the credit union, are now referred to CU Mortgage. CU Mortgage in turn, pays Priority One a fee (“finders fee”). Before resigning in 2011, former Real Estate Loan Manager, Yuling Li, warned President Wiggington and CLO, Cindy Garvin, that elimination of all but the HELOC loans would prove counter-productive and undermine the credit union’s need to instill growth and produce profit. In 2011, Mr. Wiggington admitted the credit union cannot afford to finance first mortgages though we wonder why, if the credit union is immersed in excessive capital? In January, the President complained that the terms assigned to first mortgages are “too long” to “turn a fast return” reminding us that this is a President who wants quick fixes and quick profits without investing the time and energy needed to achieve these. Good luck Mr. Wiggington, because you’re going to need that and a lot more.



THE LATEST

Another change that has been implemented is mandatory overtime on Saturdays to all employees. Employees will be divided into groups and on a rotating basis, be required to spend one Saturday each month in "training sessions" conducted at the South Pasadena branch. According to some employees attending the so-called training sessions, the classes fail to teach staff how to develop new business. This may be due to the fact the the instructors- Joseph Garcia and Yvonne Boutte, no absolutely nothing about business development.

In January, the credit union opened it's new branch in Santa Clarita. The new branch is located outside the gates of the Santa Clarita Processing & Distribution Center, 28201 Franklin Parkway, Santa Clarita, CA 91383 in an area which is inconveniently located in a rural portion of the Santa Clarita Valley. It is a peculiar choice for a location in which to attract business.

The President spent November and December and early January expounding about the potential the new branch has in reversing the credit union's financial problems but logistically, the location makes absolutely no sense. It is far from downtown Valencia, there is no community located near the new office, and it offers absolutely nothing that would prompt a person to drive miles out of their way to conduct their personal banking transactions. The branch will also only open on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. Apparently the chronically dull President believes the inconveniently located branch will replace a full-service, full-time location, conveniently located branch.

The credit union has also not lifted its freeze on employee salaries and is now using the excuse that if assigned goals are not met, employees will be denied raises.
Earlier this month, AVP, Joseph Garcia revealed Priority One may have to merge if employees fail to meet their assigned goals. Merge with whom?

AVP, Sylvia Perez continues her search for another, less expensive location in which to relocate the Burbank branch and proving she is incapable of understanding that the President seeks to entirely erase the amount currently being spent on leasing office space.

Mrs. Perez, the credit union's biggest whiner, recently complained that business at Burbank could improve if she were provided more staff. The Burbank office is currently over-staffed. The problem at Burbank is members are not interested in the location. Currently, the poorly functioning location is staffed by one long-time teller, a full-time business development representative, two part-time employees, a former real estate mortgage loan officer who due to cut-backs, now works in the capacity of an FSR and another employee who recently returned to work following a brief leave but who Mrs. Perez describes as possessing a "bad attitude."



BMW OBSESSED






Priority One might be in the throes of prosperity if President Wiggington only possessed the passion for the credit union, it's members and it's employees that he has for BMW's.










The President often boasts about his many BMW's which according to him are "collector" quality and one which is worth $100,000. In fact, he almost boasts about his BMW collection as he once boasted about the number of women he's bedded.










We recently came across a site containing photographs of one of his collector automobiles which was apparently photographed at his home in Echo Park, California. Here are the photographs:
































.



HOPELESSNESS





Don't expect the assignment of monthly sales quotas to improve business. The purpose of the quotas are to justify the termination of staff so that the President can save face and not have to order lay-offs as a means by which to keep the credit union's doors open for business.





The President's November and December declarations to renewed success ceased in January when he issued warning that unless lots of new business gotten over a 30 to 60 day period, he will have to implement more lay-offs and close the Burbank branch. You should expect the President to begin laying off staff by the end of April. You should also expect the Burbank branch to close its doors by the end of May or June. There is no way his unreasonable deadlines will be met. It's just another Wiggington delusion.





Though he spent the first week of January 2012 denying the credit union has ever been sued by any former employee; or that he has ever been accused of sexual harassment, his statements as we've proven, are an utter lie and an attempt to try and dredge up his appalling public reputation from the cesspool he kicked it into.





Mr. Wiggington's weapon of choice is lying. He just doesn't possess the self-discipline not to lie. It's who he is. He may choose to view the world through rose-colored glasses or immerse himself in utter denial, but his failures are well-documented in credit union records and in allegations contained in complaints filed with the Superior Court of Los Angeles.





Mr. Wiggington's bumbling decisions continue unabated. His appointment of Yvonne Boutte over operations and of Joseph Garcia over sales is so absurd, so inane and so illogical, it defies explanation. All we can say is expect the worst. 2012 should prove to be another disastrous year for the horrendous credit union.



















To be continued……..

Monday, September 28, 2009

Lying to the DFI




Over the past week, Priority One Credit Union's President, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr., has suddenly become more lackadaisical and has spent more and more time strolling through the main branch in South Pasadena, California, piddling time that should be dedicated to working and talking loudly on his cellular to what are apparently family and friends. One would think by his conduct that the credit union has made a full financial recovery and is again, operating in the black. 

Donning more relaxed posturing, the President has resumed verbalizing criticisms about some of his staff for what he describes as their failure to increase new membership and failing to exact efforts needed to increase revenue. 

Though its not unreasonable to address areas within the business were immediate improvements are required, it is immensely hypocritical and unproductive for the credit union's highest officer to spend his days traipsing lazily though the main branch criticizing staff members when he has contributed absolutely nothing to improving business and resolving the problems he introduced that are financially taxing the credit union's financial infrastructure. 

Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. continually reminds us that he's no strategist and though his obsessive tendency is to find fault in others and issue demands, its quite clear that he is incapable of living up to his own lofty and judgmental expectations. 

Aside from introducing reductions in spending that have their most profound impact upon the livelihoods of non-exempt personnel who are also the lowest paid sector of employees at the credit union, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr. has developed absolutely nothing nothing that will spur the development of new business and increase membership, in great part because he doesn't comprehend marketing and has little understanding about the wants and needs of the culturally diverse marketplaces served by Priority One Credit Union. 

President Wiggington has shown that he is not a participant in delving out solutions to the problems he created. He's just going along for the ride, hoping that someone else is going to do the work needed to resolve the widespread damage he alone created.

Apparently, his only talent is to boast and brag and fabricate stories of non-existent growth and prosperity that he hopes in earnest, people will buy into at face value. 

A MEMBER COMPLAINS

Since publication of our first post, we've often witnessed the President and members of the Board of Directors and the executive sector, react adversely to our reports. One of his first responses to our reports was to violate state law and order that Monthly Income Statements not be posted at any of the credit union's branches. He succeeded in not posting the statements for March, April and May, but two complaints filed with the DFI by the same member eventually forced the President to resume posting of the monthly financial statements. Of course, if business were thriving as asserted by the President, then there would have been no psychological need for him to hide the statements.

President Wiggington's addiction to lying was again attested to in how he chose to respond to the DFI. The initial letter received from the DFI was responded to by the President who simply denied the allegations and wrote that all of the statements had been posted on each and every month. This was a lie. 

Several weeks later, the President received a second letter from the DFI which reminded him that under state law, he must post the credit union's Monthly Income Statements both, at every branch and in a conspicuous location which allow easy access to the information. 

This time, the President deferred the letter to COO, Beatrice Walker, for response. We understand that at the time, the President was furious and even complained that the DFI "should get off my back." Ms. Walker wasn't discombobulated, but she was nervous because she knew he ordered, in defiance to state law, that the statements not be posted. Furthermore, he was dragging her into a situation he created. Nonetheless, she followed his instructions and composed a response. However, for some inexplicable reason, the credit union was unable to issue its response within the thirty (30) days allotted by the DFI. So, Ms. Walker requested an extension and was provided an additional twenty (20) days in which to submit her written response. 

So why would the credit union require a total of fifty (50) days in which to compose a response to what really was a simple inquiry by the DFI. Wouldn't providing a simple information accompanied by evidence have served to exonerate the credit union of all alleged wrong doing? 

Days before a response was sent to the DFI, President Wiggington conferred with AVP, Rodger Smock, in the South Pasadena employee lounge room and told the AVP that neither of them should be involved in writing a response to the DFI's inquiry and suggested the entire matter be deferred to the COO. So why was the President so adamant that neither he or his number one lackey be involved in formulating a response? 

It's also important to note, that the President refused to post the Monthly Income Statements for March, April and May 2009. Ms. Walker did not start working at the credit union until June 1, 2009. Subsequently, the incident was created by President Wiggington months before Ms. Walker started working at the credit union. So why did he deem it appropriate to defer the DFI's letter to her for response? Since she was not an employee of the credit union when the incident first began, why would she be expected to provide information she had no knowledge of? 

THE RESPONSE

In her letter dated August 11, 2009, Ms. Walker states that the Monthly Financial Statements for "March and perhaps April 2009" had not been posted due to "industry-wide events." 

Her  response is inaccurate and inconsistent with the facts. Statements were not posted for the months of March, April and May 2009.  The April 2009 Monthly Income Statement was never posted, dispelling her statement that "perhaps" that statement was not posted. Furthermore, why did Ms. Walker omit all references to the Monthly Income Statement for the month of May 2009 from her response? 

Unfortunately, when provided with an opportunity to be forthright, Ms. Walker chose what was politically advantageous which in this case was placating the dishonest and law-breaking President. 

And what are the specific "industry-wide events" that prompted the President to order that Monthly Income Statements not be posted? 

In her letter, Ms. Walker states that on March 20, 2009, the NCUA ordered Priority One "write down their ventures" formerly conducted with Wescorp. As many people know, Wescorp entered into a conservatorship earlier this year. According to Ms. Walker, the "ventures" were to be reported to the NCUA by April 23, 2009. So does her response reasonably explain why the President issued a directive in the month of March 2009, ordering that Monthly Income Statements no longer be posted at any branch? Of course, it doesn't.  

The President has now resumed posting of the Monthly Income Statements and in response, the DFI has closed the complaint. Unfortunately, the response was saturated in lies, concocted to present an excuse that the DFI might find reasonable. However, the complaint about the refusal of the President to post Monthly Financial Statements was not the only complaint submitted to the DFI regarding the President's purposeful violation of state law. The following is a copy of of a another complaint filed on June 27, 2009, by another member and proves that the credit union had withheld posting Monthly Income Statements for the months of March, April and May 2009. 

Sent: Sat 6/27/2009 8:37 PM

To: Consumer Account

Subject: Violation of Calif Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 1, Section 30.701(c)

I am a member of Priority One Credit Union and am filing this complaint regarding refusal by Priority One to either post its monthly financials for public view and have refused to post instructions either in a conspicuous or inconspicuous, easily accessible area to members. This has been ongoing since March 2009 and is a violation of California Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 1, Section 30.701(c). Thank you.

The complaint places a crimp in Ms. Walker's story. The member's complaint is dated June 27, 2009, indicating that Monthly Income Statement had not yet been posted on the date the complaint was filed. 

Ms Walker's response serves as evidence she lied. She states that March's statement had not been posted and "perhaps" the statement for April though the member's complaint, which was filed on June 27, 2009, clearly proves the April and May statements had not been posted.  

Ms. Walker's August 2009 response is also inconsistent with information provided by the President to the DFI on July 1, 2009. The information provided to the DFI by the President is shown, below:

From: Consumer Account Consumer@DFI.CA.GOV

Subject: RE: Violation of Calif Code of Regulations, Title 10, Chapter 1, Section 30.701(c)

Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:15 AM

The CEO of the Credit Union was contacted, and he stated that the statements are posted at each branch office. He did mention that there was a problem at their Valencia office recently where the current statements had not been posted and what was posted was stale dated. He indicated that this was corrected and the manager of that location was informed that the financials were to be posted as soon as they were received. He also stated that you may request copies of past financial statements, if you like.

If you would like to file a complaint against the Credit Union, please let us know.

Thank you,

Consumer Services Office
California Department of Financial Institutions
1-800-322-0622

So in response to DFI inquiries, the President and his cronies provided the following three different excuses, all which are inconsistent with one another:
  • The Monthly Income Statements were posted at all branches

  • The March 2009 Monthly Income Statement was not posted and perhaps, neither was April's statement; and 

  • Due to some unexplained problem, the Monthly Income Statements were not posted at the Valencia branch though these were posted at all other branches. 
What's more, members calling the credit union during the months of March, April and May were told by employees answering the phones that President Wiggington had not issued Monthly Income Statements to any of the branches further dispelling that it was only the Valencia branch that did not post the statements.  

Additionally, in his July 1, 2009, statement to the DFI, President Wiggington states that the statements for the months of March, April and May were not posted at the Valencia branch but had been posted at all other branches. This seems peculiar, because in her August 11, 2009, letter to the DFI, Ms. Walker states that the March statement was not posted at any branch and perhaps, also not posted during the month of April 2009. 

So what version of the credit union's excuses do you find most believable? 

TERMINATIONS


We recently received an email advising us that a Branch Manager of the credit union has recently denied that four (4) employees were laid-off by the credit union. It's incredible that the Branch Manager could be so misinformed or has chosen to intentionally distort the truth which would not be unusual at Priority One. 

In August, all employees were asked to voluntarily reduce the amount of days worked each month. By voluntarily agreeing to reduce the amount of hours they work, employees would help the credit union save money. The credit union's plan to reduce spending did not ask any executive to voluntarily and temporarily, agree to to a reduction in salary. 

Several employees agreed to work less hours without pay and were thanked by the President during the September 8, 2009 all-staff quarterly meeting conducted at the South Pasadena branch. 

However, the President and COO, later determined that reduced working hours will not have the necessary financial impact needed to substantially reduce spending and so on Monday, September 14, 2009, four (4) employees were laid-off. On September 15, 2009, notice of the terminations was posted by Beatrice Walker on the credit union's Intranet. According to Ms. Walker, the terminations were part of an aggressive effort to reduce spending. 

Hopefully, this information will help clarify the Branch Manager's apparent confusion. 


As we've said in a prior post, Charles R. Wiggington, Sr., may not be an adept liar but he is a liar. With regards to the complaints filed with the DFI, he had absolutely no qualms about 
fabricating lies but his excuses were inconsistent with one another and inconsistent with the story concocted by COO, Beatrice Walker. You'd think that these two have conferred with one another before providing the DFI with different versions of what supposedly happened with the Monthly Income Statements for the months of March, April and May 2009. 

There is no argument that Charles R. Wiggington,Sr. is the cause of Priority One's financial problems. He single handedly created the dynamic of loss which has left the credit union floundering in the RED.  And though he'll never admit that he is the cause of the credit union's problems, on some level he is aware of his culpability, otherwise why find it necessary to lie, to find scapegoats to blame for his blunders, and why make daily treks through the main branch, insisting to employees that business is great? Clearly, as attested to by the credit union's own Monthly Income Statements, business isn't great- it's awful. Never has Priority One sustained this amount of losses at any time since it's founding in 1926? 
# block visitors referred from indicated domains RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} semalt\.com [NC,OR] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} semalt\.com [NC] RewriteRule .* - [F]